From squirrel@echelon.alias.net Tue Mar 16 13:30:26 1999
Path: newscene.newscene.com!novia!feeder.qis.net!newsfeed.berkeley.edu!news.stanford.edu!su-news-feed4.bbnplanet.com!su-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.gtei.net!news.alt.net!anon.lcs.mit.edu!nym.alias.net!mail2news-x2!mail2news
Date: 16 Mar 1999 20:30:26 -0000
Subject: FZ BIBLE 18/35 SOLUTION TO ENTRAPMENT 9TH ACC
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology,alt.clearing.technology
From: Secret Squirrel <squirrel@echelon.alias.net>
Comments: Please report problems with this automated remailing service to
	<squirrel-admin@echelon.alias.net>. The message sender's identity
	is unknown, unlogged, and not replyable.
Message-ID: <90b0702e254388fe4ec965d947590f75@anonymous.poster>
Mail-To-News-Contact: postmaster@nym.alias.net
Organization: mail2news@nym.alias.net
Lines: 1097
Xref: newscene.newscene.com alt.religion.scientology:689962 alt.clearing.technology:76108

FREEZONE BIBLE ASSOCIATION TECH POST

9th ACC - THE SOLUTION TO ENTRAPMENT CASSETTES 18/35

Our purpose is to promote religious freedom and the Scientology
Religion by spreading the Scientology Tech across the internet.

The Cof$ abusively suppresses the practice and use of
Scientology Tech by FreeZone Scientologists.  It misuses the
copyright laws as part of its suppression of religious freedom.

The writings of LRH form our Old Testament just as the writings
of Judiasm form the Old Testament of Christianity.

We might not be good and obedient Scientologists according
to the definitions of the Cof$ whom we are in protest against.

But the Christians are not good and obedient Jews and yet
are allowed to have their old testament regardless of any
Jewish opinion.

We ask for the same rights, namely to practice our religion
as we see fit and to have access to our holy scriptures
without fear of the Cof$ copyright terrorists.

We ask for others to help in our fight.  Even if you do
not believe in Scientology or the Scientology Tech, we hope
that you do believe in religious freedom and will choose
to aid us for that reason.

Thank You,

The FZ Bible Association

**************************************************


9TH ACC CONTENTS

December 1954 to January 1955 in Phoenix, Arizona.

Based on the solution to entrappment cassette version.

F# = File number (** = not available)
O# = Original Number (according to the master list posted by Pilot)
REN = As renumbered in the Solution to Entrappment cassettes

F# O#  REN  DATE  TITLE

01  1   1  Dec  6 Introduction to 9th ACC: Havingness
02  2   2  Dec  7 The Essence of Auditing, Know to Mystery Scale
03  3   3  Dec  8 Rundown on Six Basics
04  4   4  Dec  9 Communication Formula
05  5   5  Dec 10 The Practice of Dianetics and Scientology
06  6   6  Dec 13 Conduct of the Auditor
07  7   7  Dec 14 Mechanics of Communication
08  8   8  Dec 15 Havingness
09  9   9  Dec 16 Pan-determinism and One-way Flows
10  9A 10  Dec 17 Hist. & Dev. of Processes: Games & Limitations in Games
11  9B 10A Dec 17 History and Development of Processes: Q&A Period
12 10  11  Dec 20 Games (Fighting)
13 11  12  Dec 21 Anatomy of Games -- Part I
14 11A 12A Dec 21 Anatomy of Games -- Part II
15 12  13  Dec 22 One-way Flows in Processing
16 12A 13A Dec 22 One-way Flows in Processing: Question and Answer Period
17 13  14  Dec 23 Havingness and Communication Formulas
** 13A --  Dec 23 After Lecture Comments   
18 14  15  Dec 24 Pan-determinism
19 14A 15A Dec 24 Pan-determinism: Question and Answer Period
20 15  16  Dec 27 Training New People
** 15A --  Dec 27 Curiosa from Dianetics 55!
21 16  17  Jan  3 Auditing Requirements, Differences
22 16A 18  Jan  4 Time
** 16AA -  Jan  4 Q&A Period
23 17  19  Jan  5 Auditing at Optimum
24 18  20  Jan  6 Exteriorization
25 19  21  Jan  7 Elementary Material: Know to Mystery Scale
26 20  22  Jan 10 Education: Goals in Society -- Adult Education
27 21  23  Jan 11 Fundamentals of Auditing
** 21A --  Jan 11 Auditors' Conference
28 22  24  Jan 12 Definitions: Glossary of Terms -- Part I
29 23  25  Jan 13 Definitions: Glossary of Terms -- Part II
30 24  26  Jan 14 Definitions: Glossary of Terms -- Part III
31 25  27  Jan 17 Auditing Demonstration: Six Basics in Action
** 25A --  Jan 17 Auditors' Conference
32 26  28  Jan 18 Auditing Demonstration: Spotting Spots
** 26A --  Jan 18 Auditors' Conference
33 27  29  Jan 19 Auditing Demonstration: Exteriorization
34 28  30  Jan 20 Background Music to Living
35 29  31  Jan 21 Axioms: Laws of Consideration -- What an Axiom Is

Note that 6 of the 9 discussion periods (Q&A periods, Auditors'
Conferences, etc.) were omitted from the cassettes, leaving us
with only 35 files instead of the 41 that were recorded.  It is
also possible that material was edited out of the lectures which
are available.  If anyone has a set of the original reels, please
post any missing material.

========================

9ACC file 18/35

9th ACC 14 (15) - PAN-DETERMINISM

Transcript of lecture by L. Ron Hubbard 9Acc14    -   
5412C24 Renumbered 15 for "The Solution To Entrapment"
cassettes

PAN-DETERMINISM

A lecture given on 24 December 1954


I want to make sure that you know how to run Communication
Processing, which is what we'll call it. Because let's say
that anything goes, anything goes in the whole formula of
communication under Communication Processing. But let's
take one specific and interesting part of it and let's
discuss pan-determinism as related to having an individual
mock up originated communications.

We discover immediately a fact which I have known for a
very long time but which was too horrible to tell you.
That's right, that's a fact. I have known this fact for,
oh, certainly, two years and have simply stuffed it in my
back pocket and skipped it until I could lick it. And that
is this: The whole world around you is an automaticity. How
can you win? Well, you can't. You got an automaticity in
all directions.

All right. An individual substitutes for pan-determinism,
prediction - let's get this right on the line here very
accurately - for pan-determinism he substitutes prediction.
When he cannot predict this automaticity in the world
around him, he substitutes confusion - nonprediction,
confusion, same breed of cat, same thing. Inability to
predict leads to a confusion, startlement, amazement,
upset. You see that?

All right. Confusion leads to mystery because the
individual backs off and will have nothing further to do
with it. Well, now, this parallels games. He does not want
to predict the other side so the end product of any game
played long enough is confusion and mystery and why every
society when it goes to hell goes into the hands of a
priesthood. And that's true of Chaldea, it was true of
Babylon, it was true of Greece, it's true of Rome, and it's
true today.

Every time a government - every time a society - let's go back
one step. Every time a society goes into electronics - which
is an unpredictability and a confusion of one sort or
another, terrific automaticities sitting around - you push a
button. When you first start out flying rocket ships, why,
you've got eighty gadgets you have to set and sixty
plotters you have to adjust in order to find out where
you're going and they finally evolve it into a point where
you push one button that says Mars or Arcturus or something
of this sort and you're there. Just as simple as this.

And this super - automaticity goes boom. into religion. And
there hasn't been an electronic society anywhere on the
track that did not work hand-in-glove with a priesthood and
which did not move into the total control of a priesthood
and which did not thereafter lose all of its technology and
so emerged into another stone age. No go - that's very high
technology-a monkey age.

You can only object to this sort of thing when you enter a
monkey age and a-and a priesthood at the same time.

Now, you have government leaders today in the United States
and elsewhere using more and more blasphemy in their talk.
They're saying God is this and God is that and we'd better
all turn to God and so on. We have the heaviest crowds
turned out in Washington, not to hear McCarthy, not to hear
the president's inauguration, but to listen to Billy Graham
who sounds off on a biased version of the New Testament in
some fashion or another. And this is - this is big stuff, see.

All right. Now, pan-determinism actually goes into desire
for a game which immediately and by postulate cuts out 50
percent of those present, Blues and the Greens, the Dodgers
and the Giants. You get the 50 percent.

And here by the way, in the latter days, I think this was
the Byzantine Empire more than the Roman Empire although
they had it in the Roman Empire, I think the Blues and the
Greens are - were looked upon not as racing teams, but as
political bodies. And a lot of their political stuff was
settled in the arena between the chariot races and the
discus pitches of the Blues and the Greens. The several
near revolutions occurred immediately resulting from the
result of games played by the Blues and the Greens. So
about 50 percent of the population was all out for the
Blues and 50 percent was all out for the Greens. You get
the idea.

Now, as we look over the picture, then, we see that
pan-determinism goes into desire for a game which splits
your forces in half and which makes 50 percent of
everything unpredictable. You don't want to predict it;
desire not to predict. As soon as you really begin to
predict you have no game. Or if you predict pretty well and
nobody thinks they're playing a game you can have a whale
of a game. But you get the idea?

Now, you see, you could reverse this whole schedule. You
could take a whole - a whole society lying there, nobody
predicting and nobody being pan-determinism and everybody
running off on twelve different horses in eight different
directions - mathematical impossibility, but it's true they
can. And you get down to a point where all of a sudden in
this mass of chaos and so forth, a group suddenly starts
predicting. Oh, why, that's a nasty sort of game. But, of
course, their target and goal is confusion; their enemy is
confusion. They actually are working in the game in order
to create a game out of a deteriorated game. You see?

Game goes all to pieces, there is no game, the barriers are
still there, you still have plenty of confusions and
mysteries arising on every hand and a small group could
then become a very much larger group simply by starting to
predict again. You see how this cycle could go? It's never
gone that way before, something new under the sun.

We think of Scientology as something that heals people and
we think of Scientology to make the sane insane and
irrational so that they no longer agree with the Income Tax
Bureau or something of the sort. We think of it as a
psychotherapy.

We might think of it as an educational activity so much so
that I believe that any Doctor of Scientology is qualified
with the right to train, will very shortly be authorized to
have a Master of Education degree. And the name of Hubbard
Professional College, possibly will remain Hubbard
Professional College, but something on the order of maybe
Hubbard College of Education, something of this sort. And
this will - it's very legal, legal as the flowers of spring,
a DScn knows more about the human mind, and knows more
about knowingness, the woof and the warp of training is
knowingness, the woof and the warp of education is
knowingness; you could give cards and spades to any Master
or Doctor of Education in the land and come out top dog. So
it's perfectly safe degree to issue and very well deserved.

All right. You could even say it's an education. But the
funny part of it is, that it is the greatest game on Earth.
That is really what it is. It is the game by which even a
confusion can be turned into a game.

Now, if we were to go around and tell people, if they say,
"What is this stuff called Scientology?" Have a big, big
squabble on this. I've been in the stores Christmas
shopping and I look-they look on the check and so forth,
and it gives my address as the HASI, you see. And they look
at "Scientology" and they say, "Huh-da-huh Scientology?"
you know.

And I say, "Well, Scientology means knowing how to know answers.

And they say "Huh."

And I was in a toy store the other day and a fellow pulls
this line, and there was a young boy who was taking time
off from college to do some Christmas clerking, and the
boss called him over - he's a mighty smart young feller, he's
taking - he's majoring in Deuteronomy or something. And he
looked at that and he didn't know what that was either, you
know. And I said, "Scientology? You don't know what
Scientology is? Why, it's the greatest game on Earth!"

And the fellow says, it's funny, he says "I haven't had any
advertisements to sell it," he says "Where can you get it?"

Well, the - you could do a lot of things with the - a know-how.
If you know-how about the guys who are playing the game, of
course you have a superior know-how to their game, any day,
don't you? So therefore the way to tell people about
Scientology is to find out what they do and then tell them
this is the thing that monitors it. That's the way to tell
people about Scientology. That's the truth.

Of course, a fellow has to be - a fellow has a sneaking hunch
that he's - or feeling that he's lying or something of this sort.

Somebody says "Well, I-I-I'm a salesman." And "I'm a
salesman," and so forth and so on. And, "What is this thing
called Scientology?"

"Why this, Scientology - Scientology is the science of sales
promotion and selling."

"Is that so? Well, where have I been?"

"Well, it's in a technical bracket you know, of course.

"Can I get a book on this?" "Sure."

He's interested, see? The fellow in the toy store, the
fellow in the toy store he says where could I get this,
see, greatest game. The salesman - it's the science of sales
promotion - where could I get this? It really means that we
ought to have a whole series of books, which I ought to get
busy and write, every one of which says, "Scientology
(second line)," you see, Scientology, The Mathematics of
Psychology. Scientology, The Composition of the Hidden
Factors of Medicine - let's see, something on this order.
That would be a tough one because I was trying to think
over how you would slow that in so that a doctor, although
he hadn't heard of it, would merely consider himself stupid
if he hadn't.

"Oh, Scientology, The Physics of Medicine." That's right,
that's... that's... we need that book.

Anyone of these oddities - professional oddities which you
see as high specializations - can be kept and monitored by
this game. Why? It's because their game has degenerated to
considerable of a confusion. And actually any game being
played, having dropped into something of a confusion, needs
some sort of a monitoring science which tells them how to
play this game because they don't even know it's a game in
addition to having forgotten how to play it. You see?

So then they know, however, instinctively that something
fits in this bracket that tells them how to play the game
called medicine. They know that something is missing up
there somewhere, see. And you come along and all you'd have
to tell them is "This is the archway that goes over your
roadway," and they're all set.

Well, all right. Now, let's look this over from a
standpoint of deteriorated games. We discover the reason a
game deteriorates is because from pan-determinism it goes
into division of sides which is nonprediction, which goes
in - of course, that's unwillingness to predict, they don't
want to predict the other side - and then that goes in
immediately into a confusion.

If you want to know why modern battles are so confused,
realize that they're right next door at a fast evolutionary
rate to unprediction, see. A real smart general using
various rules can predict the other general, you see, to
some slight degree. But where you haven't got any smart
generals anymore, you don't have battles you have confusions.

Now, I'm not trying to run down or make snide comments
about modern generals - you couldn't, there aren't any. Last
great general went with Robert E. Lee. If anybody's from
Texas - with Sam Houston. He takes fifteen Texans with cap
pistols and licks a Mexican army. He was a pretty good general.

Now, where we have a breakdown then of prediction we enter
rather rapidly into a confusion. And the course of a
battle demonstrates well-ordered lines at the beginning of
a battle and midway through this battle you will see these
lines are getting less and less well-ordered. And the end
of many a battle remains a mystery to this day. You look
them over and you'll find out that people go on discussing
it and discussing - .

For instance, there was a battle which was misnamed a
massacre up on the Little Big Horn in Montana, in which
three hundred cavalrymen of the Seventh Cavalry put up an
awful fight with the Sioux. But nobody ever got the
straight story of this. It went into a confusion fast. It
started with a general who was somewhat confused and his
officers who were more confused with no idea of the forces
which were opposing him, which was in the neighborhood of
about seven thousand well-armed Sioux - the best light
cavalry Earth has known, next to the Tartars. Seven
thousand were being opposed there by a small handful of
cavalry and this seven thousand were very well armed
indeed. And Custer went into the middle of all this; we now
have a mystery. People keep on writing about this mystery.
Actually there's no mystery at all about the whole thing.
That few guys can't win when equally armed with that many guys.

It was a fascinating thing to see the amount, though, of
mystery and upset and so forth which came out of that
confusion. And it was a very, very badly confused battle,
believe me. I have yet, although I have read practically
all the annals and reports of the entire action as they
exist today, I have yet to read one which agrees with
another. They don't even agree on where Custer lay or what
condition Custer was in at the end of the battle. He was
dead, but some say he was shot in the chest and some say he
had blown his own brains out and some say this and some say
that. But they all agree that he wasn't scalped. Everybody
agrees on this and this becomes a big mystery too. So they
invent a big meeting between Sitting Bull and Custer at
West Point - Custer being the man assigned to guide Sitting
Bull all over West Point. Probably never happened, but
somebody is trying to go back into the past to solve the
mystery.

Now, let's look at the anatomy of this. They finally get so
confused that they invent somebody that created the whole
thing. If you want to see somebody who is confused, it
will be somebody who wants the prior reason why. They
retreat from the confusion of the present to discover in
the past some causative point. And this search for
causation, when it is dropped into, is the beginning of the
evolution that we call a priesthood. When you no longer
have clear-cut sides, when you no longer have an adequacy
of battle, when you no longer have even confusion - you just
get sort of a blur - why, then, people start in - people
start in then to track back to find out where the hell
these particles came from. Why do they do that? It's an
instinctive reaction and effort to discover the original
location and time of the particle so as to make a perfect
duplicate of it and as-is the game. You see that?

So you see why they get so fascinated with going back out
of their confusion and tracking into the past trying to
discover - . Then we will get a bunch of boys who will
booby-trap the situation.

You know, the between-lives area is one of the cuter
engrams on the track. It isn't described completely in What
to Audit. The fact of the matter is, is there was not an
entrance into the MEST universe and there isn't an entrance
in the between-lives area anywhere else but in this universe.

The entrance to the MEST universe was a game which was
played by a bunch of people on people who were in the
universe. And they took people who were in the universe and
PDHed them one way or the other, in order to bring them
into a belief that they were now being shot into another
universe. This game has been played several times. It'll be
something on the order of you going down, traffic cop hits
you over the head and tells you you're now in Chicago, only
it's the same town you were in before. He infers that you
have been transported some vast indeterminate distance so
as to completely confuse you and make it impossible for
you to as-is the game. See how this would work out?

So every once in a while somebody comes up and plays this
game and he gives a span of time and space or universe, or
a jump of universe which didn't exist so as to confuse
people utterly about the game. Now, we get how to drive a
puppy dog nutty. 1951, I was talking about this. You hit
him over the head in the living room, knock him colder than
ice, then you take him in the kitchen and stand him on his
head in the corner. Let him wake up that way. See, there's
something missing.

So, of course, he can't as-is that section of track. Thus
we get the popularity of the engram. People think that
they can plot back straight through these engrams - and I
thought so too - plot back straight through these engrams
and get them arranged, we would finally locate origin of
particles. We do, we very definitely do. It's however a
little harder, longer job than we care to undertake today.

Question that could be asked now is, "Why as-is the game?"
The only reason you'd as-is the game is you couldn't make
another game out of it. The only reason you'd blow up the
playing field is because you weren't having any fun. If you
think nuclear physicists have fun, go meet some sometime.
They have fun; the only fun they can indulge in is blowing
up everything. I mean, they'll sit around and think about
this. Blow up the government.

If the government only knew of the actual mood and
conversational level of physicists when gathered together
in polite company the government would be scared. It would
be; it would be outraged. It was overhearing conversations
amongst them, now and then reported by hearsay and
elsewhere, that got rid of sixty-seven of the top nuclear
physicists in the government. They weren't guilty of
communistic practices or anything of this sort. They were
just advocating the overthrow of the government by force
and violence directly without any party line.

They are dangerous men. There is no doubt about it
whatsoever because they're not having any fun. They get
disgusted so they say, "Well, let's just blow the debris
all over hell's half acre and then nobody can discover
where it went from or where it came to. And that will be
the end of that. Hah! We'll make the law of conservation of
energy work."

See, as long as you can't find the origin point of a
particle, the law of conservation of energy will hold. The
moment that you can find the origin point of a particle in
time and space, the conservation of energy does not hold,
neither does the conservation of space. This universe would
go whooh - that would be the end of that.

Now, religion, as long as we mentioned this earlier, has
gotten us into a very beautiful booby-trap that way. They
say God created the universe; he did it in seven days - six
days and snored the seventh. This is not blasphemy, it's
merely the detailing of an untruth. And then he did all
this and that was that. And that's the origin point, and if
you don't believe it - some of the things that have been
used in the past - we will burn you at the stake, and they
did. If you don't believe it we will consign you to the
galleys and they did. If you don't believe it you are an
heretic and you will be tortured to death in various ways
and fed to lions or something of this sort.

The Christians have fed more to lions than Romans.
Christians, by the way, have fed more Christians to lions
than the Romans ever thought of. I think the total sum of
all Christians knocked off in the ten Roman purges is
something insignificant. It's something in the neighborhood
of oh, I don't know - thirty people in that vast purge that
we keep hearing about that Nero undertook. There were
thirty Christians knocked off. And I think in all the ten
purges in both Roman empires, of Christians, by reason of
the government's detestation for people who hated
everybody - that was by the way the consistent Roman
statement, that they couldn't understand these people who
had no tolerance of religion. They didn't like other people
and they hated other people who were different than they
were. And so that was bad for the state. And this was the
Roman position with regard to Christianity, nothing else.
They didn't - the Romans didn't even believe in paganism at
the time.

All right. We look over this and we find out that there
were 10,000, over a period some centuries, killed by the
government for various reasons, one of which in each case
happened to be Christianity. And there were 100,000
Christians killed by Christians in one single year in
Alexandria alone. This is an impressive statistic. That's
just one year. They had that riot every year. Just get the
idea - ten times as many in one Christian uprising against
Christians.

So they're emphatic about this, "God designed the universe
in one place." In other words this is a good
between-the-lives area; you've gone to another universe;
you are now completely out of this universe and your time
track is now all loused up and now you will go back and
join another life because it's another life. Or entrance
point to the MEST universe - you have now been taken out of
the universe you were in and now you have been put in
another universe. You see, that gap, a gap introduced there
by postulate only, and conviction. And we get this
additional mechanism by which to intro - these are the
mechanisms by which you introduce confusions so as to keep
an as-ising from taking place - you get everybody to agree on
some false origin point. And then you shoot anybody who
won't agree on this origin point. And if they don't agree
on this origin point, why that's the end of them. Get the idea?

For instance, in the Bible you get at least one exact date
for the creation of Earth. You get and the - I think that
it's generally worked out the total length of time of Earth
in this system and so forth is plotted at something like
7,396 years or something like that. That's the agreed upon
date. Whereas the half-life of radioactive materials
demonstrates this area to be about 3.5 billion years old - 
this galaxy.

Physics then had to go by the boards early in the Christian
activities and they hanged and burned and did things to
anybody who tried to experiment in the realm of science.
Why? They would trip over this lie, you see? They'd keep
exploding it. They'd do something about it.

And people get pretty frantic when you really look around
and say; "Hey you, you know, you could probably as-is this
whole thing if you wanted to." They have been forbidden to
by various lines and so on. However once an individual finds 
out that he is fairly indestructible when exteriorized, I 
am afraid that he would be harder to convince than previously.

Now, as we look over the game, anatomy of; we discover then
pan-determinism sinks into choosing up of sides, which of
course, is an unpredictability. So we get an
unpredictability; it drops into a confusion; a confusion
then goes into a mystery and individuals sitting around are
looking at what amounts to almost a total automaticity. And
they simply blind themselves to the amount of automaticity
going on.

I'll give you a little shock here. Have you predicted the
makes and types of cars going past the door in the past
five minutes? You haven't? Have you predicted the
destination of these cars? You haven't? How the hell are
you going to ever as-is this universe? Do you realize that
just that five minutes worth of randomity be sufficient to
sink you. Interesting, isn't it?

So we get a guy trying to back track in his own past to
find particles where they came from and yet you have been
in intimate contact with a great number of particles here
for the last five minutes - good solid ones. You didn't
predict a single one of them. That right? Automaticity.
There's nothing like such an automaticity as might go on,
for instance, in a busy city. Go down to Piccadilly Circus
some time. That's quite automatic. Everything runs without
asking you. And the next time you're driving on the highway
at a more isolated place, and a Greyhound bus driver stops
and asks your orders as to how he should proceed, you let
me know, will you.

Now, individuals get very, very set - fixed on the idea that
they have to predict all these things, you see. They have
to be in control of all these things because it's a
desperate and dangerous situation, you see, to lose track
of all this. So they have to predict it; they have to
control it. And they start controlling, controlling,
holding, so on and then brr-bow, they'll sit still
themselves. You see that they couldn't - . This amount of
automaticity that's sitting out there is just too great.

What does Communication Processing do?

It immediately places under control of the individual the
most important factor with which he is associated: his own
universe.

It's been a long time since you've heard of Scientology
8-8008, isn't it?

Now, Scientology 8-8008 was a formula. It said: The
attainment of infinity (that is the first eight) is
achieved by the reduction of the physical universe from
infinity (that is the second eight) to zero (which is the
first zero) and the building of one's own universe from
zero to an infinity of one's own universe. And by that one
achieves the attainment of infinity. Scientology 8-8008 was
a formula. There's no particular reason why we have ever
abandoned this formula. It's just a tough one to reach,
that's all; a tough one to put into action.

Very, very funny things start occurring when you start to
run this formula. You do various things. You start to take
over more and more of this universe. You start to care less
and less that it's going in wild and weird directions. You
become more and more able to change those directions if you
wanted to. You finally go into communication with this
universe, not some via system.

Now, did you ever exteriorize somebody and found he was not
looking at the wall, he was looking at a facsimile that
he'd just made of the wall, which was a little bit late?

Male Voice: Yeah. 

Huh? Now, as a auditor, I have actually changed my position 
in the chair in some fashion or another, just changed my 
position in the chair unintentionally - not intending to 
foul up this preclear - and have him open his eyes again 
and see that I had changed my position and receive a great 
shock of invalidation because he had been seeing me sitting 
in the other position. Well, I had been sitting in the other 
position, but I was now sitting in this position. In other 
words, he was just a little case of late (as they used to 
say when they buried them in Boot Hill out here - still 
some Boot Hills around with a coroner's report was usually, 
"A case of slow").

Well, this is just a case of a little bit late. The fellow
who makes the facsimile and then looks at the facsimile
instead of looking at the wall. It's an automaticity, he's
not aware of the fact he's doing this.

I was processing a preclear one time and got him out in the
middle of the Sahara desert. There was a jackal or
something of the sort running around. Or no, we got on a
sheep dog. That's right, an Arab sheep dog. I was along
with him and this dog was a perfectly good dog; I mean,
there wasn't any - he wasn't a vicious dog. He had fleas but
this hadn't completely ruined his temper. And this dog was
running around as nice as you please minding the sheep and
I was running this preclear on the basis of it. (I didn't
tell him that I was there. I didn't invalidate him or make
him think he was under supervision or anything of the
sort.) But the sheep dog was a brown animal with a white
ear. And I asked this fellow to describe this sheep dog and
so forth and it turns out that it was a collie with a white
ruff. And so I says, "Well, copy him. Now copy him again.
Again. Again. Again. Again. Again. Again. Again." We went
on like this for about a half an hour, see, making copies
of this dog.

And he finally saw the dog. He said, "Yes, I see the dog
now." He said, "I see the dog very well. It's a brown dog
with a white ear."

Gee whiz! You get the idea?

And yet this boy himself to some degree, had been totally
convinced that he'd been looking at the universe. You see?
But he was really kidding himself most amazingly.

Now, why should a thetan who can't be hurt anyhow take a
dodge of this character?

Well, that's just because it's so much easier to predict a
facsimile than it is the actual object. As the facsimile
didn't run the way you predicted it was going to run you
can always make it run the way that it should have been run
according to your prediction of it. And you don't get
invalidated by all this physical universe automaticity. You
see how this would be? It's much, much easier to predict a
facsimile, particularly if you made it and are controlling
it and monitoring it.

All right. And by the way, only then was this fellow able
to actually get the sensations and monitor the actions of
this sheep dog. Cute gag. I mean, I have a lot of fun,
sometimes, in a session like this. I don't bother with
going off into wild space opera, something like this. I
take something common, down to earth and ordinary, like
Farmer Brown's cow. And get the preclear to run Farmer
Brown's cow around the yard and squirt some milk in
somebody's eye. Anything that is fairly routine and
ordinary because it doesn't give the preclear a chance to
use his imagination at all. He has to perceive. Just take
the most common sort of environments instead of uncommon
ones. He feels much happier in such environments, by the
way, and it runs out and orients his current lifetime, not
some other lifetime he's stopped leading. 

All right. If we process the physical universe directly we
disabuse the person of the idea that he has to hold on to
so many old terminals and so many old facsimiles in order
to have a terminal to discharge against and so have a game.

But when you process the physical universe entirely,
completely, you run into this factor of automaticity to
such a degree that you would give your preclear a good
shove in the face. It's all right to have walls, but don't
go down to the shooting gallery and run Reach and Withdraw
from the ducks as they are being shot at by some soldiers.
You get the idea? We've got to get this fellow into a
better frame of mind about prediction, about controlling
and about pan-determinism.

All right, then. The origin of communication as mocked up
by the individual from another source than himself is
solution. That is solution. That's a truer picture to him
than the physical universe would be and you are in a
controllable sphere which doesn't then invalidate the
preclear immediately.

The odd part of it is that processing in the physical
universe works at all. This is a weird thing that the
processing has any workability in the physical universe
because of all this automaticity and these skips back on
the track and all of the twists and the lies. 'And the
universe was made by old man, says the Blackfoot. Don't
think the Christian has a monopoly upon this legend of unit
creation: manitou, some of the tribes; Old Man, some of the
other tribes. The Apache - the fellow who made Earth and the
birds and so forth, according to the Apache was a fellow by
the name of Black Hackton. Yeah, even the older Apaches
have forgotten Black Hackton. But you jog their memories
and you go around and get some toothless old crone sitting
there and she's chewing away on some snoose or something of
the sort, and she finally will up and tell you, "Oh, yes,
my grandfather... we used to have some tribal rites...
yeah, yeah, and he used to impersonate Black Hackton making
birds and making men and so on. Oh, yes, yes - Black Hackton."

They've even lost the lost point. But they attribute the
creation of man, birds, Earth, everything, heavens, skies,
stars, so forth, to one individual, which is the same trick.

Many times you get an actual individual moving into an
area. There was evidently a Norseman who did a
circumnavigation of the globe, probably around 400 or 500
A.D., of whom we hear today in various parts of Earth. In
the Central Americas he's known as Bowtan. And a little
further north he is mixed up with the god Quetzalcoatl. And
he is war and agriculture. God of war and agriculture. He
had a flaming red beard; he sailed in from the sunrise and
after a long sojourn he departed into the sunset and said
he would be back. Norseman who had evidently crossed over
very early. And we discover this same god under the name
of Bowtan in the Marianas Islands who had a flaming red
beard and who sailed in from the sunrise and who was the
god of war and agriculture and who left into the sunset and
said he would be back. And then we move into South China
and we find the god Po-han who had a flaming red beard and
who was the god of war and agriculture and who sailed in
from the sunrise and left into the sunset and said he would
be back.

I don't think the boy ever made it all the way around
because I have heard of no legend about him in middle Asia.
But it's fairly easy to track the line, he taught them
almost exactly the same thing in each place. He gave them
exactly the same thing.

Well, now, this man, according to the legends which pursued
him, actually created war and created agriculture; he
created all the growth of everything. You get the idea? So
here was an actual individual and they perverted the story
so as to make this boy responsible for everything.

All right. But you recognize that if we don't make
something else responsible according to the axioms; if we
don't say something else built it or something of this
sort; if we don't introduce some kind of a lie into it -
it won't last at all.

Well, there'd be several ways of doing this, several ways
of doing this. Enforcing people to introduce this lie or
just letting people introduce the lie.

Well, we get this kind of a condition. The kids are not
permitted to introduce a lie to make things persist for
themselves. They can't go out and say - come back in and say,
"Mama, there's the biggest battleship out in the yard you
ever saw in your life, beautiful, big battleship."

And Mama says, "Where?"

And... "On-on the lake in the backyard."

"Now, Tommy, you know there is no lake in the backyard."

See, what did she do, she just made him as-is his lake and
his battleship. And so he finally despairs, after a while,
of ever making anything persist. So he goes out and he
buys - he buys a ready-made lie, which is that it all was
made in one point at one time by one person which, of
course, takes away from him any responsibility of having
made any part of it. It wouldn't be here at all and it
wouldn't be visible to you and it wouldn't be visible to me
and it wouldn't be visible to him if we all didn't have a
hand in making it - the truth of the matter. We'd just never
see it unless some of it was of our own creation. It
just - we'd have nothing in common with it. Here's two
thetans. They start putting out anchor points to each other
and then they ball up the anchor points. They do it on
purpose. Two thetans appear, they start swapping anchor
points. One thetan pushes the anchor point to the first
thetan and then he gets one. Then he says the one that he
got back was his own anchor point. Boy does it last! It
really lasts.

But you wouldn't be here at all if you hadn't had a share
in the creation of this universe. Anybody who enforces it
upon you utterly that somebody else created the universe
simply disenfranchises you and makes you an owned property.
It takes you out of the category of being a player and puts
you in the category of being a pawn or a broken piece.
That's the way it's done. See the mechanism involved here?

So we get the combined anxieties of every person and living
form. We get these combined anxieties which are that it
will all stop somewhere or somebody will as-is it - that's an
anxiety; that it will all go on - that is another anxiety;
that it will approach me; that it will go away from me. And
we get the state of mind which we call anxiety. And that's
about all there is to it.

Now, in order to keep these things from happening they
introduce various lies, fictions, implants, all sorts of
things in order to get rid of some bad condition -
something they characterize as a bad condition. You see?
They say, "This condition's bad." Then they'll invent
something to get rid of the bad condition. And life kind of
goes this way.

Once upon a time in Martinique they had a great many French
planters - they founded, more or less, Martinique. First, I
think it was British, but then it became French. And when
the French took it over the French did an interesting
thing. They imported an enormous number of - well, the
British had imported white indentured servants, field hands
and so on, and then imported Negroes. The French imported
a lot of Negroes. And only the Negroes could survive, but
I'll be a son of a gun if they didn't get some of the more
warlike slaves. Evidently Martinique wasn't very rich and
it would take the few warriors that hadn't been bought in
islands further north, like Saint Kitts and so on, by
smarter better monied planters.

And there finally got to be quite a lot of African warriors
centralized in that particular area and the French began to
have trouble keeping them on the plantations at all.
Martinique is a pretty rugged place. It's very precipitous
and its topography is quite confusing to walk across; it
has a volcano on it and there's lots of places to hide. So
somebody got a big idea, he got this wonderful idea. What
they would do would be to go over to Africa and they would
get the fer-de-lance, which is a big, vicious, very
poisonous snake, and they would bring him over and they'd
plant him in all the swamps. And they did. And after that
they had field hands bitten while they were at work but
less field hands wanted to go into those swamps. Of course,
the fer-de-lance - I don't - not quite sure where they got the
fer-de-lance - but, the fer-de-lance in his native clime is
very poisonous and vicious as a snake, but in Martinique he
became as lazy as a French planter. And he stopped biting
people unless he were immediately stepped on. But he did
form a nuisance which the French wanted to get rid of.

So having planted the fer-de-lance, they went out and found
mongooses. They imported mongooses in large numbers to kill
all the fer-de-lances. And one of the favorite Sunday
sports down there is to turn a mongoose against a
fer-de-lance - a great big fer-de-lance and a little, tiny
mongoose about the size of a squirrel. And the mongoose
will play with this big sluggish snake for a while and then
finally do a back somersault, just like a circus acrobat,
and midway in the somersault grab the fer-de-lance by the
back of the neck, just up at the spine, and with the
remainder of the somersault flip so as to break the
fer-de-lance's neck. And that is the end of the fight. And
the mongooses began to run all over the island.

I remember one time in a street at Saint-Pierre, I saw a
cur dog walking down the street. He was just a yellow dog
and he was minding his own business. And all of a sudden
there was this ball of fur came out from the side of the
road, hit this cur dog, whap! bang! and we had a dead cur
dog - mongoose.

The French are paying a bounty on mongooses now.

Once upon a time, the white men - . White men started
scalping in this country by the way. It's quite an
interesting fact. They paid bounties on these scalps. And
they had bounty hunters, white bounty hunters down here in
Arizona who were supposed to kill off Apaches and they got
so much a scalp. And they had the awfullest time hunting
down these bounty hunters. Because the bounty hunters
would go into a farm or something like that - Mexican's;
couldn't tell the difference between a Mexican scalp and an
Apache scalp - and they would collect the Mexican scalps and
kill all the kids and so forth. And any brunette white
settler was not safe and so on. And so they had quite a
little war down here getting rid of fellows who were
supposed to get rid of ...

Do you get this chain of action? Well, do you realize that
this chain of action has been going on for about
seventy-six trillion years?

It's the most fascinating thing you ever saw in your life.
Life is always doing something weird like this in order to
give the game a new twist. They make a game and then they
have to have a game to remedy the game that they just made;
then they have a game to remedy that game.

And why do they do this?

Because each time the game goes into the cycle of
confusion. See? It goes down into confusion so they invent
a new game to solve the old game. And then this new game
they invented goes into a cycle of confusion and then it
goes into solve the old game - and the new game goes in to
cycle the - and there we go, see. "Where are we now!" It's
the most fantastic thing in the world - the most fantastic
thing that we sit here with a process that will solve this.
Fantastic! I mean, it's incredible. Couldn't possibly have
happened. But it did happen.

This process regains pan-determinism by doing one of the
more interesting things. It simply takes ideas, which is
all what it is in the first place, and has the individual
control ideas on the communication - two-way cycle of
communication pattern. And that's that! Actually, that's
about all there is to it as a process.

Unless some eager beaver auditor introduces masses and has
the individual mock up energies and tries to get specific
on putting these things on the Know to Mystery Scale, it
works. But the moment he goes in and validates all this
tremendous quantity of complication which has resulted from
inventing new games to end old games, the moment he goes
into masses and diverges from positional ideas, the moment
he starts insisting that it be in sonic it stops working.
And you get one of the most arduous processes you'd ever
wanted to confront.

Now, let's see how far we could theorize on this. Let's do
a little theory here. Let's look at a man who is in bad
condition with regard to women. He thinks he has to fight
women or something of the sort, you know? He feels himself
suppressed or repressed, exceedingly, by women. All right.
Obviously this person could be found to be - have done a
misduplication often enough, you see, to object to it. We
could say that a baby is the result of the effort for men
and women to duplicate each other. The pleasure in sex
could be the twist on this inability to duplicate. See, we
get a sudden duplication of one kind or another or
something of that sort. All right. And we say then, "The
fact of the matter is this man loses his manhood because he
keeps emanating on a stuck flow and never gets it reversed."

So, let's be real clever as auditors and let's have him
mock up men originating communications to him sexually.
You see how this would work out in theory? See, that's a
very nice theory. Obviously, we'd get a duplication then,
wouldn't we? Obviously we would get an origination of
communication which would be a duplicate of the
communication on which he's a stuck flow.

Let's say the man has become impotent - our preclear, you
see. So obviously, he's on a stuck flow so that sex has
become unreal to him. Well, let's then have him mock up men
approaching him sexually - get it to unstick, see? Or even
women approaching him sexually. And we process it in this
fashion. And we process for an hour and we process for two
and for three and for four. And our preclear is amazingly
uncomfortable. He is getting some interesting changes in a
sort of a solid, crushing sort of way. So we let it go to
the next session and we process him for four more hours
tomorrow. And then we process him four more hours on the
next. We process him for four more hours on the next. This
is - I'm actually reporting a research to you - and we found
out that we may have - we may have done a lot of good
auditing, but our preclear at the end of twenty hours is an
awful mess still. See that? We just about ruined him.
Mocking up masses. The communication of a mass to him, you
see. Even a mass with an idea, it didn't matter.

And then we set the same preclear down and we simply have
not a man, not a woman, not a dog or a cat or even a
thetan, but just a point of life out there saying, "Hello.
Hello. Hello. Hello. Hello. Hello. Hello. Hello. Hello.
Hello. Hello. Hello. Hello. Hello. Hello." On and on and
on. No acknowledgments. No answer. Nothing of the sort. But
just a point saying, "Hello." And we suddenly find out
he's no longer impotent - in an hour or so.

Which tells you what?

Well, for one thing it tells you Hubbard's right. But it
tells you basically this: That life is basically a
consideration and that it proceeds and emanates from a
postulate; and that energy exists to the degree that we
believe it exists; but that energy believed to exist is
not illusory, it exists; because all that exists and
everything that exists is a result of a condensation of;
you might say, an additional consideration of a consideration.

And if we process ideas on the communication two-way cycle,
we're processing the entrance point of any difficulty
anybody ever got into. The mass was the difficulty; the
significance was the difficulty. The significance was the
game he originated in order to overcome the game which got
confused. Follow this? When we process a mass, when we
process a significance, we are simply processing
fer-de-lance by introducing mongoose or Apaches by hiring
bounty hunters. And we just keep going back through this
kind of a mass arrangement, you see. Gaah!

See, it was the mass which was invented to solve the mass
which was wrong. Which, before that had been invented
because an earlier mass had been wrong; which, in its turn
had been invented because - and so on.

So we're not at - we're not processing, then, life at all.
We're processing the end or byproduct of life's anxiety to
have a game and to get out of the confusion resulting from.
So with all this we process ideas and considerations: the
idea of communication; the idea of hello. Not even a sonic
hello - we don't tell the fellow not to make it sonic, we
don't tell him to make it sonic. We just ask him to put
that idea out there, "Hello." Or put it behind his back - the
idea "hello." Or the idea "okay," or the idea "I did it,"
or the idea "all right" - any one of these things and we just
grind on it.

So the masses fly off in all different directions.
Naturally they will. Because the only masses that fly off
are the misarranged communication lines he is intimately
and immediately concerned with as a body right where he is
at this moment and as a thetan with a bunch of hidden and
enmassed machinery.

And that is the way you process Communication Processing,
actually, and why you process it that way. And it's a very
lucky thing that we have it because it can establish,
directly, pan-determinism. The whole point behind all of
this is the fact that he has never controlled anybody
else's conversation. He left it random. And never having
controlled anybody else's conversation it's a total
automaticity all the way back. So we have to process it to
make him take control of something he has never done
before. He's really never done this before. It's something
new. And it completely knocks apart all the masses and
everything that he gets mixed up with because they have all
been introduced to solve this automaticity of not being
able to predict what the other fellow was going to do or
say. Okay.

Thank you.

(end of lecture)



